Pick a comparison
The BugHerd alternative that captures console logs
BugHerd is excellent at what it was built for: client feedback pinned to a live website — “getting client feedback on websites, made ridiculously easy,” as their homepage puts it. But feedback-tool depth is not debugging depth: BugHerd captures a screenshot and browser metadata, and stops there.
Tiqzen captures what developers actually debug with — the console log and a screen recording alongside the screenshot — then drafts the ticket with AI and manages the whole backlog in the same product. If your reports end up with engineers, that difference is the whole game.
Searching for a free BugHerd alternative specifically? BugHerd offers a trial rather than a free tier, while Tiqzen’s Free plan is permanent — the widget, console log capture, 25 AI drafts a month and full MCP access at $0.
BugHerd vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where BugHerd is ahead.
| BugHerd | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic screenshots | Yes | Automatic with every widget report |
| Console log capture | No | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | Video feedback only | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI ticket drafting | BugHerd AI (beta) | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | BugHerd MCP (beta) | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | Kanban task board | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | Comments on tasks | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | No — none found (July 2026) | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | No — BugHerd AI is internal triage | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| GitHub linking | Via add-ons | PRs + CI build status on tickets (webhooks + manual linking) |
| Client access | Unlimited client users — their home turf | Unlimited reporters + client projects with per-client SDK features |
Which should you pick?
BugHerd
Pick BugHerd when the job is agency client review — unlimited no-login client users pinning visual feedback on staging sites is their home turf.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when reports must become engineering work: console logs captured automatically, AI drafting the ticket, sprints and PRs in the same tool, and agents on the backlog over MCP.
Frequently asked
Does BugHerd capture console logs?
No — BugHerd captures a screenshot with browser, OS and resolution metadata, but not console logs, network activity or session replays (verified on their site, July 2026). Tiqzen captures the console log and a screen recording automatically with every widget report.
The Usersnap alternative built for the engineering side
Usersnap has repositioned as a product-discovery platform — “winning products connect user evidence at every step.” Feedback, surveys and opportunity boards for PMs. Bug capture is one feature among many, and the developer essentials sit up-tier: error console logs only arrive on the Professional tier.
Tiqzen puts the developer path first: console logs captured on every plan including Free, reports landing in a native backlog with sprints and PR links, AI drafting the ticket, and an MCP server so agents can work the queue. Evidence in, shipped fix out.
It also holds up as a free Usersnap alternative: console log capture — Professional-tier on Usersnap — sits on Tiqzen’s $0 plan, together with the widget, the backlog and MCP.
Usersnap vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Usersnap is ahead.
| Usersnap | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic screenshots | Yes | Automatic with every widget report |
| Console log capture | Professional tier only | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | No (video feedback via forms) | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI features | AI triage of feedback | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | None found (July 2026) | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | No — syncs to your tracker | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | No | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Surveys & NPS | Yes — their strength | No — Tiqzen stays a bug tracker |
| Release notes to users | Yes — Announcements & changelog (Starter and up) | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | Feedback & support menu — links out to your own docs/chat | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| GitHub linking | Via add-ons | PRs + CI build status on tickets (webhooks + manual linking) |
Which should you pick?
Usersnap
Pick Usersnap when the goal is product discovery — micro-surveys, feedback boards and user-evidence workflows for PM teams.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when the goal is fixing bugs: full capture from the free tier, a real backlog, AI drafting and agent access over MCP.
Frequently asked
Does Usersnap include console logs on all plans?
No — error console logs are a Professional-tier feature per their live pricing page (July 2026). Tiqzen captures console logs on every plan, including Free.
Does Usersnap have an MCP server?
We found no MCP or AI-agent support on Usersnap’s site as of July 2026. Tiqzen ships a first-party MCP server on every plan, so Claude, Cursor and other agents can work your backlog.
What does Tiqzen cost for a 10-person team?
Tiqzen Team is $39/mo for 10 seats, with unlimited captures and AI drafting included — and a free tier before that. For Usersnap’s current rates, see their pricing page.
The Userback alternative where the backlog is built in
Userback is a polished user-feedback platform — “collect and act on user feedback 10x faster” — with session replay, annotated screenshots and roadmap voting. It’s feedback tooling for product teams; dev-tools depth like console and network capture sits in the Business tier, and tickets ultimately sync out to a separate tracker.
Tiqzen removes the “separate tracker” part: the widget’s captures land directly in a native backlog with sprints, ticket-scoped chat and GitHub PR links, AI drafts the ticket from your PRD, and the MCP server exposes it all to agents — on every plan, not the top one.
As a free Userback alternative, Tiqzen starts at $0 with capture, the built-in backlog and MCP included — no Business-tier gate in front of the developer features.
Userback vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Userback is ahead.
| Userback | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic screenshots | Yes, annotated | Automatic with every widget report |
| Console log capture | Business tier | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | Yes | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI features | AI summaries (Business+) | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | MCP connector | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | No — syncs to your tracker | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | No | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | Yes — Portal Announcements (paid Feature Portal add-on) | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | None found (July 2026) | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| Roadmap voting & surveys | Yes — their strength | No — Tiqzen stays a bug tracker |
Which should you pick?
Userback
Pick Userback for feedback-program tooling: session replay on user feedback, public roadmaps, surveys, and a mature catalog of third-party add-ons.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen to collapse two tools into one: capture AND the tracker, with AI drafting and MCP agent access included from the free tier instead of gated behind Business.
Frequently asked
What does Userback gate behind Business?
Dev-tools capture (console logs, network) and session replay sit in the Business tier and up, per their pricing page (verified July 2026). Tiqzen includes console log capture on every plan, starting at $0.
Do I still need Jira or another tracker with Tiqzen?
No — that’s the point. Userback syncs feedback into a separate tracker; Tiqzen IS the tracker: kanban, sprints, subtasks, ticket chat and GitHub PR links live where the captures land.
Which is better for AI-agent workflows?
Both ship MCP connectivity, but Tiqzen pairs it with a native backlog — agents don’t just read feedback, they work tickets end to end (list, create, update) with per-key project scoping.
The Gleap alternative that ends at a shipped fix
Gleap is an in-app feedback suite — bug reporting plus chatbot, product surveys and a knowledge base, strongest in mobile SDK scenarios. It’s a customer-experience toolkit with bug capture inside.
Tiqzen is narrower on purpose: capture the bug with its evidence, draft the ticket with AI, run the backlog, ship the fix. No chatbot, no marketing suite — a bug tracker with the deepest possible developer loop, including an MCP server agents can work through.
If a free Gleap alternative is the goal, Tiqzen’s Free plan covers it: 3 seats, 30 captures a month, 25 AI drafts and full MCP access — no credit card.
Gleap vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Gleap is ahead.
| Gleap | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic screenshots | Yes | Automatic with every widget report |
| Console log capture | Yes | Automatic console log capture |
| Product focus | CX suite: feedback + chatbot + KB | Bug tracking, start to finish |
| Mobile SDK | Yes — their strength | Web SDK (JavaScript) |
| AI ticket drafting | AI features in suite | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | Not advertised (July 2026) | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | Feedback board | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | Customer chat widget | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | Yes — News & Changelogs (Team plan) | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | Yes — Kai AI agent, doc-grounded (their strength) | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| GitHub linking | Via add-ons | PRs + CI build status on tickets (webhooks + manual linking) |
Which should you pick?
Gleap
Pick Gleap when you want a customer-experience suite — in-app surveys, a support chatbot and knowledge base next to bug reports, especially on mobile.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when bugs deserve a dedicated pipeline: evidence-rich capture, PRD-grounded AI drafts, sprints, ticket-scoped chat, and agents on the backlog over MCP.
Frequently asked
Is Tiqzen a full Gleap replacement?
For bug reporting and tracking, yes — capture, triage, sprints and PR links in one product. Tiqzen deliberately does not replace Gleap’s chatbot, surveys or knowledge base; it goes deeper on the bug loop instead.
Which handles AI agents better?
Tiqzen ships a first-party MCP server on every plan — Claude, Cursor and any MCP client can list, create and update tickets with per-key scoping. Gleap advertised no MCP support as of July 2026.
What does Tiqzen cost to try?
Nothing — the Free plan includes 3 seats, the capture widget (30 captures/mo), 25 AI drafts and full MCP access. Paid starts at $39/mo for 10 seats.
The Marker.io alternative that owns the whole loop
Marker.io is the established website-feedback tool — “the website feedback tool for bug reporting, QA and UAT” — with genuinely deep capture: console logs, network requests and a 3-minute session replay, verified in their docs. Reports sync two-way into the tracker you already run.
That last clause is the fork in the road. Marker.io assumes a separate tracker; Tiqzen is the tracker. Captures land in a native backlog with sprints and ticket chat, AI drafts the ticket from your PRD (Marker’s AI stops at rewrite and title generation), and the MCP server hands the backlog to agents on every plan.
The difference is sharpest if you want a free Marker.io alternative — Marker.io offers a 15-day trial but no free tier, while Tiqzen’s $0 plan keeps the widget, AI drafting and MCP permanently.
Marker.io vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Marker.io is ahead.
| Marker.io | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic screenshots | Yes, annotated | Automatic with every widget report |
| Console log capture | Yes | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | Replay clips up to 3 min | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI ticket drafting | Rewrite & title generation | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | Marker MCP | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | No — two-way sync to your tracker | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | No | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | Per-issue resolved emails (Status Sync) — no changelog feed | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | No | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| Client / guest access | Guests — 50 on the Agency plan | Public workspaces — externals capped at Read/Write, every plan |
| Free tier | No — 15-day trial | Yes — 3 seats, MCP included |
Which should you pick?
Marker.io
Pick Marker.io when your tracker is fixed (Jira, Linear…) and you want a mature feedback widget synced into it.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen to stop paying for a tracker AND a capture tool: one product from widget to shipped fix, with AI drafting that writes acceptance criteria, not just titles.
Frequently asked
How does capture compare between Marker.io and Tiqzen?
Both capture screenshots and console logs automatically. Marker.io keeps short replay clips; Tiqzen attaches full screen recordings up to 50MB. After capture the paths diverge: Tiqzen adds AI drafting, a native backlog, ticket chat and MCP.
What does Tiqzen cost at 10 seats?
Tiqzen Team is $39/mo for 10 seats, with a free tier to start on. Marker.io lists its current plans on its own pricing page; it offers a trial rather than a free tier.
The Jam.dev alternative for teams that want the tracker too
Jam.dev nailed developer-first capture: “one click bug reports devs love,” with console and network logs, instant replay and auto repro steps — and MCP debugging even in its free tier. As a capture-and-share tool, it’s the benchmark.
What Jam deliberately isn’t is a tracker: Jams link out to Jira, Linear or wherever the backlog lives. Tiqzen keeps the capture-first spirit and adds the destination — reports become tickets in a native backlog with sprints, ticket-scoped chat, PRD-grounded AI drafting and MCP agents that can update status, not just read a recording.
Jam’s own free tier is genuinely generous, so a free Jam.dev alternative only matters when you want the tracker included too — Tiqzen’s Free plan bundles capture and the backlog in one $0 product.
Jam.dev vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Jam.dev is ahead.
| Jam.dev | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| One-click capture | Yes — browser extension | Widget + SDK in your product |
| Console log capture | Yes | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | 5 min free / 15 min on Team | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| Auto repro steps | Yes — their signature | Screen recording up to 50MB |
| AI features | AI debugger, 200 summaries (Team) | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | Jam MCP (debugging), free tier | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | No — links out to your tracker | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | No | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | No | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | No — captures inside your existing support chat | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
Which should you pick?
Jam.dev
Pick Jam.dev for pure capture-and-share on top of an existing tracker — its auto repro steps are a genuinely nice touch.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when you don’t have (or don’t want) a separate tracker: capture lands as a managed ticket with sprints, chat and PR links, and MCP agents can move work — not just inspect a Jam.
Frequently asked
Jam.dev has MCP in its free tier — what’s different in Tiqzen’s?
Jam’s MCP exposes captured Jams for debugging. Tiqzen’s MCP exposes the backlog itself: list, search, create and update tickets, scoped per API key — agents manage work, not just read evidence. Both are free-tier.
What does Tiqzen cost for a 10-person team?
Tiqzen Team is a flat $39/mo for 10 seats, tracker included, with a free tier before that. Jam prices per creator — see their pricing page for current rates.
The Bird Eats Bug alternative with an uncapped free tier
Bird Eats Bug — now “Bug Capture by BrowserStack” — does deep technical capture: screen recording with console logs, network activity and environment attached, routed into the tracker of your choice. Solid tooling, backed by BrowserStack’s test cloud.
Two catches, verified on their site: the free tier caps at 15 uploads a month, and there’s no AI or agent story at all — no drafting, no MCP. Tiqzen’s free tier includes 30 captures, AI drafting and full MCP access, and paid plans never cap captures. The report doesn’t route out to a tracker; it lands in one.
That cap is exactly why people go looking for a free Bird Eats Bug alternative: their free plan stops at 15 uploads a month, while Tiqzen’s includes 30 captures plus AI drafting and MCP.
Bird Eats Bug vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Bird Eats Bug is ahead.
| Bird Eats Bug | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen recording capture | Yes — their core | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| Console log capture | Yes | Automatic console log capture |
| Free-tier capture cap | 15 uploads/month | 30 captures/mo free · uncapped on paid |
| AI ticket drafting | None found (July 2026) | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | None found (July 2026) | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | No — routes to Jira/Linear/etc. | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | No | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | None found (July 2026) | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | Hands off to your own Intercom/Zendesk | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
Which should you pick?
Bird Eats Bug
Pick Bird Eats Bug when you live inside BrowserStack’s ecosystem and want its capture depth — including network logs and replays — feeding an existing tracker.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen for the AI-era loop Bird doesn’t have: AI drafts the ticket from the capture, agents work the backlog over MCP, and the free tier doesn’t stop at 15 uploads.
Frequently asked
What is Bird Eats Bug’s free limit?
The free plan allows 15 uploads per month (verified on their pricing page, July 2026). Tiqzen’s free plan includes 30 captures a month, and paid plans remove capture limits entirely.
Does Bird Eats Bug have AI or MCP features?
We found neither on their marketing site as of July 2026 — no AI ticket drafting and no MCP/agent support. Tiqzen ships both on every plan, including Free.
What does Tiqzen cost for a 10-person team?
Tiqzen Team is a flat $39/mo for 10 seats, with a free tier to start. Bird Eats Bug prices per seat on top of a base plan — their pricing page has the current numbers.
The Jira alternative that captures the bug, not just the issue
Jira is the enterprise default for a reason: deep workflow configuration, a huge marketplace, and the center of the Atlassian suite — with Rovo AI now bundled into paid tiers and an official MCP server (GA since February 2026, Cloud only). What Jira has never shipped is evidence capture: there is no native end-user widget, so the screenshot, console log and recording all depend on marketplace apps and reporter discipline.
Tiqzen starts where the bug starts — a reporter-facing widget that attaches the console log, screenshot and recording automatically — then runs the same loop Jira runs (backlog, sprints, PR links), with AI drafting and a first-party MCP server included on every plan instead of gated by tier.
For small teams hunting a free Jira alternative for bug tracking, Tiqzen’s $0 plan carries the whole loop — widget capture, console logs, backlog, sprints and MCP — without marketplace apps to assemble first.
Jira vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where Jira is ahead.
| Jira | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| End-user bug capture | No native widget — marketplace apps | Widget with screenshot, console log & recording |
| Console log capture | No | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | No native capture | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI ticket drafting | Rovo AI in paid tiers | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | Yes — Rovo MCP Server (Cloud, GA Feb 2026) | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | Yes — the industry benchmark | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | Comments on issues | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | Per-version notes — internal, copy to Confluence | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | Virtual service agent — separate JSM product, Premium tiers | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| GitHub linking | Via GitHub for Jira app | PRs + CI build status on tickets (webhooks + manual linking) |
| External collaboration | Standard tier and up | Public workspaces — externals capped at Read/Write, every plan |
Which should you pick?
Jira
Pick Jira when you need the enterprise standard: cross-team portfolio work, compliance-grade workflow control, and the Atlassian ecosystem around it.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when the job is bugs specifically — evidence arrives with the report, AI drafts the ticket from your PRD, and agents work the backlog over MCP on every plan, at a flat price instead of per-user math.
Frequently asked
Can Tiqzen replace Jira for bug tracking?
For the bug loop, yes: capture, triage, sprints, boards and GitHub PR linking are all native. Tiqzen adds what Jira lacks out of the box — a reporter-facing widget with automatic console logs and recordings, plus AI drafting on every plan. For cross-team portfolio management, Jira remains the deeper tool.
Does Jira have an MCP server?
Yes — Atlassian’s Rovo MCP Server went GA in February 2026 for Atlassian Cloud (not Data Center/Server). Tiqzen ships a first-party MCP server on every plan including Free, with per-key project scoping designed for handing agents a backlog.
The ClickUp alternative built for bugs, not everything
ClickUp is the "everything app": tasks, docs, goals, native Chat, Clips screen recording, and a hosted MCP server in public beta on all plans — with ClickUp Brain AI as a paid add-on. Breadth is the pitch, and for general project management it genuinely delivers.
What breadth doesn’t cover is the start of a bug’s life: ClickUp has no reporter-facing capture — Forms take intake, but nothing attaches the console log or a recording of the failure. Tiqzen is narrower on purpose: the widget captures the evidence, AI drafting is included rather than an add-on, and the whole loop from report to merged PR lives in one bug-first tool.
And if you landed here looking for a free ClickUp alternative for bug tracking: Tiqzen’s Free plan includes AI drafting rather than selling it as an add-on, plus the capture widget and MCP from day one.
ClickUp vs Tiqzen, feature by feature
Competitor details verified on their live site (July 2026) — including the parts where ClickUp is ahead.
| ClickUp | Tiqzen | |
|---|---|---|
| End-user bug capture | Forms intake — no console or screen capture | Widget with screenshot, console log & recording |
| Console log capture | No | Automatic console log capture |
| Screen recording | Yes — Clips (recorded by your team) | Screen recordings up to 50MB |
| AI ticket drafting | ClickUp Brain — paid add-on | PRD-grounded drafts with acceptance criteria, every plan |
| MCP / AI-agent access | Yes — hosted MCP, public beta, all plans | First-party MCP server, free on every plan |
| Native backlog | Yes — tasks, sprints, the works | Native kanban, sprints, subtasks, workflows |
| Real-time ticket chat | Yes — ClickUp Chat + task comments | Ticket-scoped real-time chat (mentions, presence) |
| Release notes to users | Brain drafts an internal doc — no end-user surface | AI release notes from shipped tickets, shown in the widget |
| Doc-grounded support chat | No — ClickUp Chat is team messaging | In-widget chat answering from your per-project uploaded docs |
| GitHub linking | Via GitHub integration | PRs + CI build status on tickets (webhooks + manual linking) |
Which should you pick?
ClickUp
Pick ClickUp when you want one app for everything — projects, docs, chat and goals in a single per-user subscription.
Tiqzen
Pick Tiqzen when bugs deserve their own pipeline: evidence-capturing widget, PRD-grounded AI drafting included in the price, and a production MCP server on every plan.
Frequently asked
Is Tiqzen a ClickUp alternative for bug tracking?
For bug tracking, yes. ClickUp manages any kind of work; Tiqzen owns the bug loop specifically — reports arrive with the console log, screenshot and recording attached, AI drafts the ticket, and the backlog is MCP-native. For company-wide project management, ClickUp is the broader tool.
Does ClickUp have an MCP server?
Yes — ClickUp hosts an MCP server (public beta, available on all plans, verified July 2026). Tiqzen’s MCP server is first-party and production on every plan, with per-key project scoping built for autonomous agents.
How does AI pricing compare?
ClickUp Brain is a per-user add-on on top of a paid plan. Tiqzen includes AI drafting in every plan: 25 drafts a month free, 200 on Team, unlimited on Business.
Switching is a workspace away: import nothing, install the widget, and try AI ticket drafting and the MCP server — both included on the Free plan.
Try the whole loop free before switching
Widget capture, AI drafting, backlog and MCP — the Free plan covers all of it. No credit card.